I can’t believe I’m saying this: Go Cal.

UC Berkeley recently announced that they will offer incoming freshman free genotyping at three genetic loci for folate, alcohol and lactose.  This is part of a tradition at Cal to engage entering students with some shared intellectual activity (the “On the same page” program).  I believe it is absolutely critical that we immediately start educating students about genetics, and the use of genetic tests in making decisions in life.  I think that direct engagement with personal data is one very effective way to make all the issues crystal clear.  This should be optional and there should be adequate safeguards, but this should not stop us from getting started in educating the general population about the promise and pitfalls of genetics.   Thus,  I think that this is great and that Cal (a traditional rival of Stanford, thus the title of this post) deserves credit for bringing genetics to the consciousness of our next generation of leaders.  Some have voiced concerns, and these can be handled with reasonable precautions.  I am particularly amused by the concern that knowledge of genetics might induce poor behavior with respect to alcohol consumption.  While this is certainly a theoretical possibility, it is my impression that students are already making poor decisions about alcohol consumption at such a rate that knowledge of genetics is unlikely to affect this trend appreciably.  In fact, anything that gets the pros/cons of alcohol consumption into the discussion while students are sober is probably a good thing.   We have featured alcohol genetics on a site to help high school biology students can see genetics in action.    So, at least in the NARROW ARENA OF PROVIDING GENETIC INFORMATION SO STUDENTS CAN LEARN…Go Cal!



  1. I am so in favor of this also. Thanks for supporting it. I understand it has been temporarily stopped. Pity. Every time someone wants to stop progress I think “Eppur si muove” Need we suffer inquisitions over and over in the name of patents and dollars?

  2. I think its a great idea to engage young adults in aspects of their genomic health. Even though most of these students have probably learned something about genetics in high school, I think they got the design the wrong way round ie. sending out the packages with the spit tubes and consent forms in before they do the seminar series. Wouldn’t they be more informed consumers if they have heard all the arguments first? Then they can really consent or not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s